Planning and development are of continuing interest to the residents of Leeds North West.

As we have reported before, all decisions on planning are now circumscribed by the Coalition’s National Planning Policy Framework. Only last week, some Coalition rebels [ not including our own Mr Mulholland] raised the huge problems the NPPF poses for Local Authorities – and the extent to which the NPPF has left Councils no longer masters in their own house.

Leeds City Council, like all planning authorities, is deeply concerned about this.
open space1

So this week it will discuss proposals to give local people more power in planning decisions.

Two issues in particular are crucial: ‘brownfield first’, and the power which the NPPF has given to developers through their right to appeal to planning inspectors and override local decisions.

Councillor Peter Gruen, Deputy Leader of Leeds City Council, will call on the Coalition government to do two things.

First, to restore the requirement for brownfield sites to be considered in detail instead of developers being able to make successful applications for greenfield land.

Second, he will argue that there needs to be a “levelling of the playing field” for planning decisions. Under the current rules, developers have the chance to ignore local decision making and instead appeal to planning inspectors with little local knowledge to make favourable appeal decisions. Local residents have no similar rights to appeal against decisions they disagree with.

What Councillor Gruen is proposing  is that local planning decisions should carry no automatic right of appeal. This would be in cases where there is a clear and established local plan to develop the site, which has already been subject to public consultation.

Councillor Peter Gruen said: “People in Leeds want to make sure that appropriate brownfield sites are used before our greenbelt is further encroached upon by developers. A return to a national presumption of using appropriate brownfield sites first would help us achieve our ambitions of protecting greenfield and greenbelt sites wherever possible.

“The current planning scheme is fundamentally unfair as it gives developers multiple bites of the cherry. If the local decision is not one that they like, they can appeal to a planning inspector to override the panel’s verdict. However, local residents cannot appeal when a decision is made to build in their area.’

The NPPF is, as we have reported before, a Developers’ Charter. There are many problems with it.

But Leeds Council is trying to address some of them head on.

Britain Can Do Better Than This – and Labour Councils like Leeds are showing how.

If you want a regular digest of stories from this website and updates from us click here

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “Brownfield over Greenfield + level playing field for Local Residents: Leeds Labour Council challenges the Coalition

  1. Although i agree totally that Brownfield sites should be considered over Greenfield sites, and that we should look for some parity in relation to this matter. What should also be tabled is the inequality in tenure type. Most of the properties built on Greenfield sites are well outside the purchase range of the majority of first time buying, and the level of rented accommodation made available is pitiful. You also get this NIMBY approach whereby residents living in a wholly residential area do not want to see what is commonly called ‘social’ housing built in their areas. This type of social engineering creates resentment within social classes, and is a a blight on the landscape within this country.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s